HaLow, Range. TeeHee.

It's Not Just Braggadocio

Free Range. Literally.

TeeHee HaLow has the best range of any camera control product, period.

Not all 900MHz is created equal. TeeHee HaLow doesn’t simply rely on a generic wireless module soldered to a PCB; it pushes camera control further than ever by utilizing next-generation hardware designed in Australia by the WiFi HaLow pioneers at Morse Micro.

Data Driven. Empirically Tested.

Don’t let a lack of information obfuscate your decision-making process when shopping for camera control hardware. While theory is necessary, pragmatic comparative analysis reveals exactly how TeeHee HaLow performs. The following study, completed within controlled yet real-world environments, was conducted so that my peers can make informed decisions on how to spend their hard-earned freelance income.

Scientific Abstract

The following inquiry examined the comparative abilities of sub-1GHz camera control bridges to collect range data from multiple non-simulated physical environments.¹ Five sample units from each OEM were deployed spatially and intentionally within three discrete public environments to determine range based on a consistent pairing ratio value. Because this was not a study to determine objective values such as antenna patterns or other values within a controlled RF environment, the resulting data is entirely comparative and analyzed in that manner. External variables were controlled when feasible in an effort to achieve the most accurate results possible.²

This study reviewed three popular 900MHz bridges advertised as being optimized for cinema camera controk. While not a precursor nor guarantor of performance, the collected data repeatedly demonstrated that TeeHee HaLow had the furthest comparative range when tested across the same environments as two other popular 900MHz camera control bridges currently available on the market. The two other 900MHz bridges demonstrated similar range abilities in multi-pairing modes when utilizing default device-side settings.³ ⁴ TeeHee HaLow performed better than the other units across the board, regardless of environment and pairing ratio. TeeHee HaLow repeatedly exhibited a 90′ range increase over the competition in 1:1 pairings, and it was able to access areas that the competition could not when faced with physical obstructions in an outdoor park. In 1:4 pairings, TeeHee HaLow retained full range capabilities rather than the nearly 50% decrease in range caused by 1:4 pairing ratios in the other two product offerings. Because mesh configuration was not available for the other units at the time of testing, no mesh testing was conducted given the comparative data-seeking objective that was inherent to this study.

These range results have direct implications for customers who want to make informed decisions about how they will deploy 900MHz product offerings based on the number of cameras they seek to control and their typical physical environments.

Empirical Data

The following data sets have been mapped visually to make them intuitive and accessible for reference. While the placement of cameras is to scale, you may also click the marked data points on the map to see explicit distance from the primary hub.⁸ Digital markers are color coded by camera, and the button at the top left of each map lets you layer data points as desired. “900MHz Bridge 1” represents an unnamed competitive product in this study. By default, all layers are enableduse the checkboxes in the aforementioned left menubar to filter out data points as desired.

On mobile, the following data is most interactive if you click the full screen button in the top right of each map, which will present the data natively in the Google Maps app.

Data Set 1
1:1 Exterior Line-of-Sight

Data Set 2
1:1 Exterior to Interior

Data Set 3
1:4 Exterior Line-of-Sight

Not Your Mother’s Mesh Network

If TeeHee HaLow’s point-to-point connection still isn’t far enough for your situation, you can simply enable HaLow mesh (802.11s) from the web GUI for virtually unlimited range.

What’s that you say? Sorry, with HaLow mesh enabled, you’re so far away that you’re now beyond earshot…

Data Collection Notes

  1. Testing was conducted by DOT LOL, INC. in August 2024 using preproduction TeeHee HaLow US units without internal UPS. Physical height, placement of all products and orientation of external antennas were kept consistent throughout each test to ensure accurate data points, and all external technical accessories (i.e. antennas) were attached as instructed by the OEM. Data was collated and visually mapped for intuitive reference.
  2. All hardware was tested using stock antennas recommended by the respective OEM. Antenna type and antenna orientation were kept consistent throughout testing in order to retain the integrity of antenna reliance on local ground planes. All test units, including the “hub” unit, were placed at the same height for all tests due to the sensitive nature of low-frequency hardware.
  3. Neither bridge offered by other OEM’s offered user-changeable software settings at the time of data collection, ergo default settings were inherently employed for variables such as exact channel, channel width and DFS. Throughout testing, TeeHee HaLow utilized 4MHz channel bandwidth at 914MHz with DFS disabled, which are the recommended out-of-the-box settings.
  4. To minimize interference on overlapping frequencies, all tests were conducted sequentially and isolated by product line: Only one type of product (e.g. TeeHee HaLow) was tested at a time while others were powered down and offline. During 1:1 pairing tests, idle paired units were powered down to revert active bridges to 1:1 pairs.
  5. In addition to reviewing live video feeds of all attached IP-based cameras, pings were constantly monitored on client devices (i.e. cameras with designated IP’s) to more accurately track connection quality during real-time data collection.
  6. All hardware and software on tested units was verified to be current as of the test date.
  7. Performance tests reflect the approximate real-world range performance of listed 900MHz hardware at US frequencies allocated by the FCC for consumer use. Due to legal and geographic constraints, testing at the center-band HaLow frequency of 868MHz was not conducted, and the aforementioned results do not account for data points that may otherwise occur below 900MHz.
  8. For all tests, the unit denoted as the “hub” (as defined by hub-and-spoke topology) was always stationary.